Above is just one of several examples of perjuring priest Bob Malm’s witness tampering; his wife Leslie similarly has repeatedly engaged in witness tampering.
There are three things notable about this particular example of perjuring priest Bob Malm’s misconduct:
- Malm specifically references the ongoing litigation.
- Malm copies Jeff “Sugarland” Chiow, the attorney representing Bob and the church. Since several instances of witness tampering occurred after this, it is fair to conclude that Sugarland made no objection.
- Malm copies Pat Wingo, the canon to the ordinary, or assistant to bishop Shannon Johnston. Thus, it is fair to conclude that the diocese was and is good with perjuring priest Bob Malm’s witness tampering.
In short, there has been a profound lack of accountability for perjuring priest Bob Malm at every level.