UPDATE: January 2021. Perjuring priest Bob Malm now claims, in sworn courtroom testimony, that his discovery responses are “some form prepared by my attorney.” Leaving aside the fact that the content and diction is unmistakably Bob’s, three things:
- Perjuring priest Bob Malm still swore it was true, regardless of who prepared the document.
- By lying about who prepared his discovery responses, perjuring priest Bob Malm tries to throw Sugarland Chiow under the bus in order to save his own sketch backside. Nice.
- I have forwarded perjuring priest Bob Malm’s claim to the disciplinary committee handling the ethics complaint against Sugarland. The committee can figure out for itself whether perjuring priest Bob Malm or Sugarland is telling the truth.
Below is Bob’s written statement, made under oath during the discovery phase of our litigation, in which he committed perjury. Mom has NEVER made an appointment with him—of that I am certain. If nothing else, she loathes him. Why would she even want to meet with him? Nor has anyone made an appointment on her behalf or claiming to be her. Period.
Nor is Bob’s perjury inconsequential. Instead, it goes to the very heart of his lies about how he’s been threatened, as he cites this as part of the basis for his conclusion that Mom’s blog actually is mine. So Bob is either guilty of perjury, or he is innocent of perjury by virtue of the fact that he is so mentally ill that he cannot differentiate between truth and his lies.
Now, let’s take a look at perjuring priest Bob Malm’s statement in the current Virginia litigation. Under oath, he states: